دیںجواب کا سوال اس

Harry Potter سوال

Book Hermione VS Movie Hermione and Book Dumbledore VS Movie Dumbledore. Your opinions needed.

Okay, so I'm writing a paper on Harry Potter and the Prisoner of Azkaban right? And I'm discussing the major character changes in the book and movie as well as the plot.

Hermione (since CC is no longer directing) is changed from this extreme goody two shoes to this normal teenager who has less of a problem with Ron and Harry's misbehaving and breaking the rules.

Dumbledore (who was played perfectly سے طرف کی Richard Harris and is now portrayed سے طرف کی Michael Gambon) goes from this whimsical loveable man, to this serious and intimidating man, who still shows his massive intellect and wisdom to those around him.

I have also discussed Book Malfoy VS Movie Malfoy as there are severe changes in the 3rd film and book but I have that down perfectly since I love Draco :3.

What do آپ think? Anything I'm missing. I'd love your input on these characters.
 slytherinangel posted پہلے زیادہ سے سال ایک
next question »

Harry Potter جوابات

dpaisita97 said:
Well Hermione i think is cause shes becoming مزید mature and مزید used to Harry and Ron. Though i did prefer old Dumbledore, he was less intimidating and light hearted, instead of serious and boring. Though i find Draco to be the same agrivating (supermegafoxyawesomehot) bully that he is
select as best answer
posted پہلے زیادہ سے سال ایک 
Embobem said:
In the book she didn't really care much about appearance, but in the movie "Is that really what my hair looks like from the back?" <-This line killed me. Oh, my gosh. So un-Hermione like. And this isn't PoA, but in OOTP (my least پسندیدہ movie -.- soooo unlike the book) after she stunned Ron she was all giggly with the girls in the D.A., uhh, that wouldn't really have happened in the book. D: tsk. She was مزید of an 'outsider' in a sense, I guess. Her hair wasn't as bushy as well, but that all comes down to the stylists and what they can do. I remember reading about them trying to make her have buckier teeth سے طرف کی wearing ایوارڈز and such, but they only did it for the first scene they filmed in SS because it impaired her speech یا something. Hair doesn't always cooperate as well.

Moving on to Dumbledore, I think آپ pretty much have it covered. There's not much مزید I could add other than تفصیل to what آپ said.

Sorry if I didn't help at all, I'm kind of writing this late so if something doesn't make sense I apologize.
select as best answer
posted پہلے زیادہ سے سال ایک 
*
I don't know... I actually think movie!Hermione shows a side of Hermione that is genuine to the character but Harry doesn't always see. Hermione is not a 'giggling with the girls' type of person, but she does share a dormitory with them and in HBP Paravati did not seem nearly as Harry did when she played 'giggling girl' in reference of McLaggen. I don't think 'is that really what my hair looks like from the back?' is entirely un-Hermione like either... I mean, she doesn't care about her appearance because she has a different set of priorities in life, but having کہا that, when it is mentioned she can be incredibly self-concious about it, as one of her defining characteristics despite her great bravery and strength is her lack of true self-surity/confidence. When she was younger, she was not pretty and that bothered her to the extent she stopped trying; she instead focused on her intelligence, and when she was introduced to this new, magical world she was so afraid of not-fitting in she read everything in sight so no one could tell her she was worse/less intelligent than a pureblood - which is also why 'mudblood' used to affect her so much. Also, her looks in the movie (I felt) were quite accurate, in that although she did not have the buck teeth and not quite as bushy hair, which admittedly could be better, she always had an understated prettiness that she continued to come into as she grew older and part of that was the re-sizing of her teeth and the slight-flatterning + owning of her hair.
babybell posted پہلے زیادہ سے سال ایک
*
also, as for Dumbledore, which I was going to post as an answer but might as well post here, there is one reason why I never minded the exchange between Harris and Gambon - because the change between, as آپ (slytherinangel) put it 'rom this whimsical loveable man, to this serious and intimidating man, who still shows his massive intellect and wisdom to those around him' is the change Harry subconsciously perceived during the coarse of the books. Dumbledore pretends to be merely this senile, loveable, harmless old man because a) he is a very successful manipulator and knows the power of underestimation as detailed in Sun Tzu's 'The Art of War' but also b) he is afraid of the brilliant, powerful side of him because that is the side of him that is attracted to the Dark Arts (like Voldemort). Therefore though in the فلمیں the change as premature, this was definitely a changed that the readers perceived during the series as we struggled with Harry in the 5th through 7th کتابیں about how he could be on the one hand sweet and loveable and on the other complicated, brilliant, scary and having these darker tendencies and making these manipulative, calculated sacrifices 'for the Greater Good'.
babybell posted پہلے زیادہ سے سال ایک
next question »