Harry Potter
دیںجواب کا سوال اس
Harry Potter سوال
How do the prophecies work in this universe?
'Cause I think there's contradictions with them in the books. But surely something like this must have been thought through. I just can't quite grasp it.
Obviously, the prophecy about Harry and Voldemort was self-fullfilling as it only happened because Voldemort heard of it and chose to act on it out of fear, and even without knowing the full contents. This was self-fullfilling سے طرف کی positive feedback.
But then, the prohecy that ended up being about Peter Pettigrew returning to Voldemort's service.
This could be almost be seen as self-fullfilling سے طرف کی negative feedback, but if memory serves right, Harry was the only one who heard it and never told anyone about it.
Though Harry probably realized in the Shcak that the phropecy was about Peter, and he tried to prevent it سے طرف کی having the Dementors take him...It was still Remus who provided the crucial circumstances for Peter's escape. Sure, Remus saw Peter in the Marauder's Map and thus hurried to the Shcak but the point is - he didn't know about the prophecy and had no reason to think Peter would try to return to Voldemort, and in the book Harry didn't tell him about Peter on the Map.
So, this prohecy isn't purely self-fullfilling سے طرف کی negative feedback because the key character in it's fullfilmment didn't know about it.
I read somewhere a Rowling quote that went something along the lines that prohecies only come true because they are made. That would seem to work for the Pettigrew one, but why then the کتابیں make such a big deal about the Harry/Voldemort one having been heard and forwarded to Voldemort and then also about coming true because of Voldemort's own choices? I mean, those are huge events in the storyline right down to Dumbledore specifically and lengthily telling Harry that it was Voldemort's own fault that it came true.
And if really all it takes for a prohecy to come true is that it's made, that it doesn't need to be heard سے طرف کی and acted upon سے طرف کی that person, why is it made at all? If no one knows about i
Obviously, the prophecy about Harry and Voldemort was self-fullfilling as it only happened because Voldemort heard of it and chose to act on it out of fear, and even without knowing the full contents. This was self-fullfilling سے طرف کی positive feedback.
But then, the prohecy that ended up being about Peter Pettigrew returning to Voldemort's service.
This could be almost be seen as self-fullfilling سے طرف کی negative feedback, but if memory serves right, Harry was the only one who heard it and never told anyone about it.
Though Harry probably realized in the Shcak that the phropecy was about Peter, and he tried to prevent it سے طرف کی having the Dementors take him...It was still Remus who provided the crucial circumstances for Peter's escape. Sure, Remus saw Peter in the Marauder's Map and thus hurried to the Shcak but the point is - he didn't know about the prophecy and had no reason to think Peter would try to return to Voldemort, and in the book Harry didn't tell him about Peter on the Map.
So, this prohecy isn't purely self-fullfilling سے طرف کی negative feedback because the key character in it's fullfilmment didn't know about it.
I read somewhere a Rowling quote that went something along the lines that prohecies only come true because they are made. That would seem to work for the Pettigrew one, but why then the کتابیں make such a big deal about the Harry/Voldemort one having been heard and forwarded to Voldemort and then also about coming true because of Voldemort's own choices? I mean, those are huge events in the storyline right down to Dumbledore specifically and lengthily telling Harry that it was Voldemort's own fault that it came true.
And if really all it takes for a prohecy to come true is that it's made, that it doesn't need to be heard سے طرف کی and acted upon سے طرف کی that person, why is it made at all? If no one knows about i
|
next question » | ||
|
|
|||
