not a kids movie-AT ALL

I wouldn't be okay with a kid watching DHP2. It was kinda creepy and dark.

Twilight got nominated, and some things in BDP1 might've been a bit awkward for little kids...not to bash Twilight or anything, I'm really not trying to be mean. I just think that HP was okay to be at the KCA'S!

^ I agree about the Twilight thing, I think Breaking Dawn was inappropriate too. But just the fact that the movie was rated PG-13 is a red flag that it shouldn't be nominated for an awards show for kids. Most of the kids that watch the awards and vote for it are under 10.

I honestly don't care. Kids watch so much violent, dark, and disturbing things nowadays in movies, tv shows, and video games. DH Part 2 is nothing compared to some other things kids watch. DH Part 2 also sent a good message to kids: Good prevails over evil....ALWAYS.

No it was awesome and my sister who's 6 thinks so

I don't think any PG-13 movies ought to be eligible for the KCAs.

I don't think so.

Honestly. That movie is not PG-13 in my mind.

No.And when i was at the cinama to see deathly hallows part 2 i saw like 10 8 or 7 yrs old.NO JOKE
and ive saw all the twilghts in cinama exsept twilght (i would of but i never knew it was there)
and ive saw million of little kids NO JOKE AGAIN

One word-
Twilight.

No HP should be nominated for every award.

Dumb Kristen Stewart got an award, and Breaking Dawn is even MORE not for children.

About what VampiresRevenge said, I didn't know the average age was 10 or under. But, I think people that are over ten vote anyway. So they (KCA's) make it appropriate for the above ten voters. But as long as other inappropriate movies are allowed then Harry Potter should be allowed.