posted by estudioso
Alright I just went through the Rolling Stone's فہرست of the 100 Greatest artists of all time and Paul wasn't in there. That is appalling. Statistically he should be in the سب, سب سے اوپر five. It is an outrage. Why would Rolling Stone do something like that. John Lennon made it and he only did a few albums. My theory is that the panel Rolling Stone assembled to make the فہرست is incompetent, which is shown سے طرف کی that mistake as well as many numerous other wrong and weird rankings. Also, I have heard that Rolling Stone magazine never really liked Paul McCartney and never took his موسیقی history, but still he should have been on that list.