What do u think of the host movie campred to the book?

 cici1264 posted پہلے زیادہ سے سال ایک
next question »

The Host جوابات

Twilight1108 said:
Honestly, the movie was terrible compared to the book. The book was really in-depth and amazing, but the movie...not so much. I think Andrew Niccol, the director and screenwriter, could have done a much better job with everything. Plus, Saoirse Ronan (Melanie) should've brushed up on her acting skills a bit--lots of people at the movie theater were laughing at her bad acting because some of the scenes she did were just so fake and unrealistic.
select as best answer
posted پہلے زیادہ سے سال ایک 
xo_charturn_xo said:
I loved the movie just as much as i loved the book. I was like reading the book for the first time all over again. Although the book went into a lot مزید detail, and explored things آپ couldn't see in the movie, i thought the film was an amazing representation of the book. The characters and settings mirrored how i pictured them in the book. All in all i thought the movie was as amazing as it could have been, while trying to fit 600 pages worth of writing into a 2 گھنٹہ film, and i could not criticise it whatsoever.
select as best answer
posted پہلے زیادہ سے سال ایک 
*
That's quite a distinction from my answer ^^^ lol
Twilight1108 posted پہلے زیادہ سے سال ایک
KristinHallows said:
I thought the book was better but I liked Ian more
select as best answer
posted پہلے زیادہ سے سال ایک 
edcool said:
I never saw the movie because I knew intuitively the book was better. The book made its point without the unneccessary violence. The film seemed loaded with gunplay and intergender fisticuffs which the talented Saoirse Ronan can do. Again, it wasn't needed. I think most true شائقین of the book should ask themselves what they're paying for.
select as best answer
posted پہلے زیادہ سے سال ایک 
TheHostLover said:
The movie and the book was amazing
select as best answer
posted پہلے زیادہ سے سال ایک 
next question »