دیںجواب کا سوال اس

Sex and Sexuality سوال

How come in ancient Greek/Roman art, men had small penises?

Large penises are considered attractive and the people in art were considered beautiful, but they had such small penises. Does that mean small penises were considered ideal a long time ago. As an artist I can't help myself.
 uploaded900 posted پہلے زیادہ سے سال ایک
next question »

Sex and Sexuality جوابات

MarineHolocaust said:
yeah they were considered attractive because it was مزید "boyish"
gross i know
select as best answer
posted پہلے زیادہ سے سال ایک 
NocturnalMirage said:
Also, people were considerably smaller in every way back then (height for example). So smaller people would mean smaller tick-tacks I presume...
select as best answer
posted پہلے زیادہ سے سال ایک 
BabyBlud said:
Actually the reason is because most artists in the 1400's to 1600's would get their life still artists (people who would pose naked) from corpses, as living people would find it obscene. The human body in all shapes and forms were celebrated however only behind closed doors and with spouses.
When bodies were دیا to artists, they would be at least 24hrs cold, and most appendages were stiffened and shriveled (no nicer way to put it).
But also to put a point, penis' are only larger through erection, posing naked in those times was not something آپ found arousing, it was work and very serious work, so men who did pose live (although not many would have) would not have been aroused enough to cause erection.
select as best answer
posted پہلے زیادہ سے سال ایک 
*
I see your point but there are still men out there with large penises without having an erection
uploaded900 posted پہلے زیادہ سے سال ایک
*
There are generally two kinds of penises. Ones that are full sized but limp when not aroused, and those that are quite small until they are aroused. Fully erect, both generally are the same size.
V_W_Singer posted پہلے زیادہ سے سال ایک
next question »