Don't get me wrong, she's pretty but I wouldn't call her gorgeous. She looks creepy to me.

Shes one of the prettiest women I've ever seen and her eyes are one of the most beautiful eyes.

She was a beautiful woman, but I wouldn't go as far as compliments are concerned as most people go, especially the eye thing. My eyes are virtually the same colour, so....

She does have gorgeous eyes and she's definitely pretty but I agree she's overrated, though I think she's more beautiful than Marilyn.

Overrated = you are fucking jelly.

How the heck could someone be jelly? Genius! *rolls eyes*

*Zim voice* THIS HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH JELLY.
...Sorry. XD

Average looking and did *not* have purple eyes.

She did look quite nice with longer hair, however.

A slightly more attractive version of Marilyn Monroe. Nice hair color, but both are average and even a bit unattractive in pics.

For brunettes I prefer Audrey Hepburn and Romy Schneider.

KataraLover, excuse me for replying back so late.
You are, hater! *flips hair*

I don't care what you think

She was gorgeous.

She's gorgeous, but I've seen much more beautiful women. Just look at Emma Watson, Audrey Hepburn, Judy Garland, Victoria Justice, Meghan Ory, Shay Mitchell, etc.
She's overrated in the acting department, as well. Why she won two Oscars (both of which were undeserved, if you ask me; Deborah Kerr or Shirley MacLaine should've won the 1961 Oscar, and Vanessa Redgrave or Lynn Redgrave should've won the 1967 one) while people as brilliant as Marilyn Monroe, Bette Midler, Lauren Bacall, and Glenn Close have never won even one (in Marilyn's case, she was never even nominated once) is beyond me.

I'd like to see her without makeup.