Debate Club
شامل میں
Fanpop
New Post
Explore Fanpop
 courtesy of www.dividedwefail.com, though it says a lot about compromise, if آپ ask me.
courtesy of www.dividedwefail.com, though it says a lot about compromise, if you ask me.
When I created this spot nearly a سال ago, my intention was to create a فورم for the respectable exchange of ideas among educated individuals. To my great excitement, I got exactly that: multifaceted individuals who knew where they stood but were curious to learn about others and make their own ideas known. There were the occasional people who would refuse to listen and only talk, and there were the occasional users who would refuse to acknowledge a good point against them. But over all, I've enjoyed our lively discussions.

For a time, the debate spot was lacking in any real "debate." There were lively discussions, but generally full of folks who kept agreeing with each other, who would play "devil's advocate" for fun. I created the Great Debate to give some structure (and serious debate) to the spot. There has only been one successful Great Debate so far, the winner of which was link, whom I am very grateful to for competing. The اگلے Great Debate is slotted for July (I have been too busy this ماہ to orchestrate one) and will center around "Resolved: That The Iraq War should end now," a topic proposed سے طرف کی link. If this generates no debaters, we will اقدام to the اگلے مقبول topic, "Resolved: That eating meat is immoral," کیا پیش سے طرف کی link. I will be Moderator once again, and we will need three judges.

Now that my plug for that is over, I wanted to say that while it's nice to find folks who agree with you, I think it's intellectually stimulating to chat with folks who don't. Learning different viewpoints and ideas is how we grow. It is for this reason that I am thankful for the minority of users who vote for the less مقبول options in picks-- such as voting against link, یا for the link, یا against link, یا for link. Because while the majority of the spot may disagree with you, آپ are the voice of dissent. And I always encourage dissent. :o)

Inevitably, there is one thing that I hope people gain from the conversations on this spot, and that one thing is "perspective." If آپ expect people to listen to you, try listening to them first. We all lose our heads. I myself am guilty of forgetting myself in the heat of a debate, یا rolling my eyes at a response. But I urge you-- all of you, no matter what nationality آپ are یا political party آپ may support, to remember that this spot is a place of learning, not preaching. Sure, آپ can preach. But take in a sermon یا two yourself. آپ may find yourself seeing the world a little differently.
added by tessajanuary
Source: Dan Piraro, King Features Syndicate
Martin Sheen calls out a "doctor" for calling homosexuality an abomination, based on the Bible.
video
politics
the west wing
homosexuality
martin sheen
the bible
religion
old testament
laws
added by kateliness2
Source: ProgressiveBoink.com
added by Cinders
Source: Beeler / The Washington Examiner / Cagle Cartoons
added by Cinders
Source: Gary Varvel / The Indianapolis سٹار, ستارہ
added by Cinders
Source: Cinders
added by Dearheart
Source: Newsmax
added by Dearheart
Source: Newsmax
added by blisslikethis
Source: Okanagan Awareness Movement FB group
added by Cinders
Source: FunnyJunk.Com
added by Cinders
Source: FunnyJunk.Com
added by Cinders
Source: FunnyJunk.Com
added by Cinders
Source: http://www.funnyjunk.com
This مضمون details the arguments supporting the position that "wooden pencils are better than mechanical pencils" in the link, in order to ensure that arguments are not repeated and also for the audience to keep track of the arguments and their counters. This مضمون was last updated on 8 April 2008.

The arguments come in two forms: arguments for the superiority of wooden pencils, and arguments for the inferiority of mechanical pencils.

Wooden Pencil Superiority

Argument: Wooden pencils write thicker than mechanical ones.
Counter-argument: Thinner lines are preferable where thin sharp lines are...
continue reading...

The prevailing prejudice in the United States in this post 9/11 world is against Arabs, specifically Arab Muslims. I'm not saying there aren't other "isms" at play in the US, سے طرف کی any means, but آپ can't deny the repugnant anti-Arab sentiment that has permeated its way into American culture. For the ignorant American, it is just another reason to hate another group.

 Photograph سے طرف کی Nigel Parry
Photograph سے طرف کی Nigel Parry
In the immortal words of Aron Kader: "If بش just came out and called everyone in the Middle East a mother fucker, don't آپ think half of America, maybe مزید than half would go... 'link"

Now,...
continue reading...
added by berly
added by Cinders
Source: Garry Trudeau
added by Cinders
Source: Someone who's parodying Dogma
added by alismouha