In Spider-Man 3, should it have been Peter that gets killed instead?

I think it would have made him مزید heroic if he sacrificed himself to save Harry and MJ and the rest of NY. What do آپ guys think?
 PotterLambert93 posted پہلے زیادہ سے سال ایک
next question »

Spider-Man جوابات

edcool said:
I figure it takes a lot for even a superhero to forgive the enemy, and Spider-man knew this. A suprehero protects life instead of taking it away, and that's the responsibility Uncle Ben told Peter about. Forgiveness is the core of every hero's values, and that's what Spidewr-man did with Sandman in Spider-man 3.
select as best answer
posted پہلے زیادہ سے سال ایک 
gthouse67 said:
I think Spiderman has to continue to live, therefore Peter must live.
select as best answer
posted پہلے زیادہ سے سال ایک 
Britneys1Fan said:
It proberly won't make no مزید Spiderman movie business if Peter's dead.. After all, it is sad that Harry dies and all. :P
select as best answer
posted پہلے زیادہ سے سال ایک 
Bond_Of_Fury said:
That would have been heroic. But I would've hated it, and a lot of kids would have too. Spider-Man dead!? Just imagine.
select as best answer
posted پہلے زیادہ سے سال ایک 
son_goku said:
آپ cant kill spiderman so easily. He is legendary hero. He cant die so fast. There are numerous villains to be faced.
select as best answer
posted پہلے زیادہ سے سال ایک 
next question »