When I first learned that Warner Brothers Studios and D.C. Comics planned to release another Superman movie, I did not greet the news with any enthusiasm. In fact, my first reaction was sheer frustration. The last D.C. Comics movie I wanted to see was another Superman movie.
There were so many reasons for my negative reaction to the news of a new Superman movie. The last one I saw was 2006's "SUPERMAN RETURNS", which had been directed سے طرف کی Bryan Singer. There had also been two ویژن ٹیلی series about the Man of Steel in the past twenty (20) years - "LOIS AND CLARK: THE NEW ADVENTURES OF SUPERMAN" (1993-1997) and "SMALLVILLE" (2001-2011). The film subsidiary for Marvel Comics have shown a willingness to release فلمیں featuring a vast array of their comic book characters. On the other hand, D.C. Comics seems to be stuck on either Superman یا Batman for ویژن ٹیلی and movie material. There have been minor exceptions to the rule - including the Oliver Queen/Green Arrow character that became a regular on "SMALLVILLE"; the 2011 film, "THE GREEN LANTERN"; and the current roster of WB ویژن ٹیلی shows like "ARROW" (the Green Arrow again). Five years ago, Wonder Woman had not been a subject of a movie یا ویژن ٹیلی series in her own right since the Lynda Carter series from the 1970s. And Aquaman merely served as a guest character on "SMALLVILLE" for a few episodes. However, he will finally have his solo film in another six months.
I had one other reservation regarding the announcement of a new Superman movie. The producers had chosen Zack Synder to direct the film. And I have never been a پرستار of his films before 2013, at least the ones I have seen - namely the very successful "300", and the critically acclaimed "THE WATCHMEN" (however, I have become a پرستار of this movie since). When I learned he had been selected to direct the حالیہ Superman film, "MAN OF STEEL", my enthusiasm sunk even further. However, I saw the movie's new trailer a few months before the movie's initial release and my opposition to it began to wane. What can I say? It impressed me. So, I decided to open my mind and give "MAN OF STEEL" a chance.
Thanks to David S. Goyer's screenplay and the story created سے طرف کی him and Christopher Nolan, "MAN OF STEEL" follows the origins of Superman. Well . . . somewhat. The movie begins on the planet of Krypton, where scientist Jor-El assists his wife in the birth of their newborn son, Kal-El. Due to years of exploiting the planet's natural resources سے طرف کی the planet's inhabitants, the planet has an unstable core and faces imminent destruction. Jor-El and Lara plans to send their son to Earth to ensure his survival. They also infuse his cells with a genetic codex of the entire Kryptonian race, something that the planet's military commander, General Zod desires. Zod and his followers commit a military coup. And the general murders Jor-El, after learning what the latter did with the genetic codex. But Zod and his followers are immediately captured and banished to the Phantom Zone. When Krypton finally self-destructs, the explosion frees Zod and his people; setting them on a تلاش for young Kal-El and the genetic codex at other worlds colonized سے طرف کی Kryptonians.
Kal-El eventually lands on Earth and in the middle of the Kansas countryside. A farmer and his wife - Jonathan and Martha Kent - adopts and raises him, renaming him Clark Kent. However, Clark's Kryptonian physiology gives him super abilities on Earth, which raises a lot of social problems for him. Jonathan eventually reveals to Clark that he came from another planet and advises not to use his abilities in public. Following Jonathan's death, a bereaved Clark spends several years roaming the country and working at odd jobs, while he deals with his grief and save people in secret. He eventually infiltrates a scientific discovery of a Kryptonian scout spaceship in the Arctic, which had been discovered سے طرف کی the military. Also there is a reporter from the Daily Planet named Lois Lane. Clark, who is unaware of being followed سے طرف کی Lois, enters the alien ship. It allows him to communicate with the preserved consciousness of Jor-El in the form of a hologram. Jor-El reveals Clark's origins and the extinction of his race, and tells Clark that he was sent to Earth to bring hope to mankind. Meanwhile, General Zod and his crew pick up a Kryptonian distress signal sent from the ship Clark had discovered on Earth. Zod arrives and demands the humans surrender Kal-El, whom he believes has the codex, یا else Earth will be destroyed.
So . . . what did I not like about "MAN OF STEEL"? For one, I disliked the shaky cam photography used سے طرف کی Amir Mokri. I disliked its use سے طرف کی Paul Greengrass in some of his movies. I disliked its use in "QUANTUM OF SOLACE". And I certainly did not like its use in this film. It made the final confrontations between Superman and the Kryptonians مزید confusing. Then again, David Brenner's editing certainly did not help - not in this scene یا in the burning oil rig sequence in the movie's first half hour. I have been a پرستار of Hans Zimmer for years. But I found his score for this movie rather heavy-handed, especially his use of horns.
Fortunately, there was a great deal مزید about "MAN OF STEEL" that I liked. And I find this amazing, considering my past opinion of director Zack Synder. David S. Goyer and Christopher Nolan wrote a first-rate origin story for Superman. I noticed that they utilized the same یا a similar story structure that they had used in the Dark Knight Trilogy. Instead of allowing Superman to face his most famous adversary in the first film, Goyer and Nolan utilized Superman's Kryptonian origins to play a major role in the film's story. Instead of Lex Luthor, Superman's main nemesis in "MAN OF STEEL" proved to be General Zod. Some شائقین of the franchise were annoyed سے طرف کی this. I was not. Goyer and Nolan also did a first-rate job in exploring Clark Kent/Superman's emotional growth, the loneliness he had endured during his childhood in flashbacks and those years he wandered before discovering the Kryptonian ship in the Artic, and his wariness toward the human race. I especially do not recall any گزشتہ Superman story یا ویژن ٹیلی series exploring the latter. How very original of Goyer and Nolan. Some شائقین have complained about the different twists that Goyer, Nolan and director Zack Synder made to the Superman mythos - especially in his relationship with reporter Lois Lane. I do not understand the complaints, considering the number of twists and changes that have been made to the Superman mythos in فلمیں and especially ویژن ٹیلی during the past twenty years. And honestly? The twist to Clark/Superman's relationship with Lois made the story fresher.
Originally, I did not particularly care for the over-the-top destruction featured in "MAN OF STEEL". But I have changed my mind about it in the following years. One, it made sense to me that such damage would occur in an invasion of any kind - alien یا otherwise. And the consequences of this destruction was felt in the following movie, "BATMAN V. SUPERMAN: DAWN OF JUSTICE". I must admit that the special effects featured in that last scene impressed me very much. I was also impressed سے طرف کی their work in the sequence that featured Superman's fight against Faora-Ul and the other Kryptonian in Smallville. But the one sequence that featured some great special effects happened to be the one on Krypton. I found the effects very beautiful. In fact, there were other aspects of that sequence that really impressed me - namely Alex McDowell's production designs, Anne Kuljian's set decorations, Kim Sinclair and Chris Farmer's art direction and especially James Acheson and Michael Wilkinson's costume designs. Some have complained سے طرف کی the lack of red shorts for Superman's costume. But I did not miss them. مزید importantly, I liked how Sinclair and Farmer linked Superman's costume with those worn سے طرف کی many of the Kryptonians.
When I first heard that Henry Cavill had been hired to portray Clark Kent/Superman, I must admit that I was somewhat taken aback. Mind you, the idea of a British actor portraying an American comic book character was nothing new, thanks to Christian Bale's portrayal of Bruce Wayne/Batman and the Anglo-American Andrew Garfield's حالیہ portrayal of Spider-Man. I only felt uncertain if Cavill could portray a Midwesterner with the proper accent. Okay, I am not an expert in Midwestern accents. But Cavill handled the American very well. مزید importantly, he gave a superb performance as the quiet, yet emotional Clark Kent who had spent a good number of years wallowing in loneliness. I was surprised that Amy Adams had signed on to portray Daily Planet reporter Lois Lane. I did not expect her to appear in a comic book hero movie. But I must admit that I really enjoyed her performance, especially since her Lois proved to be a lot less blind about Superman's secret identity and مزید willing to track down the truth. Michael Shannon effectively utilized that same intensity that provided for his Nelson وین Alden role in HBO's "BOARDWALK EMPIRE" in his performance as the single-minded Kryptonian General Zod.
Antje Traue proved to be even مزید scary than Shannon as Zod's second-in-command, the less verbal Faora-Ul. Laurence Fishburne gave an intense performance as Perry White, the no-nonsense editor of the Daily Planet. Russell Crowe's Jor-El not only proved to be charismatic, but something of a bad ass. Ayelet Zurer provided a great deal of pathos and emotion in her performance as Superman's mother, Lara Lor-Van. Diane Lane proved to be the movie's emotional rock in her down-to-earth performance as Martha Kent, Superman's adopted mother. And Kevin Costner's portrayal of Jonathan Kent proved to be just as charismatic as Crowe's Jor-El and as emotional as Zurer's Lara. The movie also featured some solid performances from the likes of Richard Schiff, Michael Kelly and Christopher Meloni. I was really impressed with Harry Lennix's performance as the commanding, yet paranoid General Swanwick.
"MAN OF STEEL" had a few problems. But I believe that the movie possessed a great deal مزید virtues, including a first-rate story created سے طرف کی David S. Goyer and Christopher Nolan and a superb cast led سے طرف کی a talented Henry Cavill as Clark Kent/Superman. But I was very surprised سے طرف کی Zack Synder's direction, especially since he managed to curtail some of his less-than-pleasant excesses in past films and at the same time effectively helm a first-rate movie. For the first time I could remember, I found myself being مزید than pleased سے طرف کی a movie directed سے طرف کی Synder.
