Within the past month, I put a pick up on the Vampires Spot asking about people's پسندیدہ book series about vampires. In the تبصرے of this pick, I got into an argument about whether the vampires of Twilight are actual vampires (lame to argue about this, I know hahaha).
Specifically she was telling me that Edward wasn't really a vampire because "he has no fangs and doesn't need blood to survive, also the sun thing...". I replied saying that just because Stephenie made her vampires different doesn't mean that they're not vampires. In the end we agreed to disagree.
Personally, I feel that the Twilight vampires are so much better because they are different. I love that they don't fit into the stereotypical definition of a vampire. It's actually really refreshing, I think. I like that they don't have fangs یا need to rely on blood یا any other difference they have from the stereotype.
I don't know why this bothers me so much. I mean, I just don't understand why a vampire has to fit the whole definition of a vampire to be considered one. Don't get me wrong, I do enjoy other vampire books, shows, movies, etc. "Buffy" started my whole obsession with vampires.
I guess one reason it bothers me so much is because that girl I argued with کہا she only read the beginning of the first one. I noticed that in the تبصرے of picks from the Vampires Spot, she was always putting down Twilight and bashing on it. I finally got fed up and کہا something to her, hence the argument we had.
Please tell me your thoughts: do آپ consider Twilight vampires to be considered vampires even though they don't fit into the definition?
Specifically she was telling me that Edward wasn't really a vampire because "he has no fangs and doesn't need blood to survive, also the sun thing...". I replied saying that just because Stephenie made her vampires different doesn't mean that they're not vampires. In the end we agreed to disagree.
Personally, I feel that the Twilight vampires are so much better because they are different. I love that they don't fit into the stereotypical definition of a vampire. It's actually really refreshing, I think. I like that they don't have fangs یا need to rely on blood یا any other difference they have from the stereotype.
I don't know why this bothers me so much. I mean, I just don't understand why a vampire has to fit the whole definition of a vampire to be considered one. Don't get me wrong, I do enjoy other vampire books, shows, movies, etc. "Buffy" started my whole obsession with vampires.
I guess one reason it bothers me so much is because that girl I argued with کہا she only read the beginning of the first one. I noticed that in the تبصرے of picks from the Vampires Spot, she was always putting down Twilight and bashing on it. I finally got fed up and کہا something to her, hence the argument we had.
Please tell me your thoughts: do آپ consider Twilight vampires to be considered vampires even though they don't fit into the definition?
This scene is very revealing because we can see the bracelet that Jacob gave Bella plus the bite mark left سے طرف کی James and finally the ring, too.
Remember that this ring is very special because it belonged to Elizabeth Masen, the biological mother of Edward, so it has a lot of sentimental value.
The ring is gorgeous, with tons of diamonds. It shows the true love that Edward has for Bella, and that he wants to spend eternity with her.
Of course, the ring scene in the book and movie is one of the most romantic and emotional of the Twilight series.