1.Ginny is a perfect character (“Mary Sue”), which Rowling hides سے طرف کی calling her temperamental. 2. Being temperamental is not a flaw if everyone thinks it’s cute and adorable and it gets آپ a boyfriend. 3. NOBODY can do anything productive without magic. 4. Ginny runs after a train like an idiot even though this isn’t her first time watching the train leave with her brothers. Obviously she’s watch the train leave EVERY SINGLE سال OF HER LIFE. 5. Rowling is living out her own fantasies through Hermione, who is clearly herself. 6. The کتابیں aren’t well written, just because آپ make up...
This is not my opinion. It's an excerpt from an مضمون titled link. I have however come across a few people who have voiced the same thing. Just curious to know people's thought on this.
I’ve read all of J.K. Rowling’s Harry Potter books—devoured them, really, because whatever her flaws, the lady does a terrific job at building compulsive narratives and enjoyable worlds. But the مزید time I spend away from the series, the مزید its problems get to me, and the biggest problem of them all is the main character himself. Harry is, to put it kindly, an absolute no one. He suffers...
So I am reading reasons as to why Twilight شائقین think Twilight is better than Harry Potter. I just want to make it clear; there is a big difference between liking one series better than another, and one series actually being better than another. I also want to reply to some of the مزید common ones I've seen.
"Twilight has مزید love!" Okay, Twilight does not have مزید love than Harry Potter سے طرف کی any means. Twilight has a lot of obsessive lust, which is often mistaken for love, but they are quite different.
Why is their relationship lust? Why isn't it love?