Bleach عملی حکمت
دیںجواب کا سوال اس
Bleach عملی حکمت سوال
Ethos of Soul Society
A حالیہ manga chapter finally revealed the impetus behind the Quincy Annihilation Plan, arguably the most anachronistic action that Soul Society has taken. The reasoning behind this was not that relations between the two societies simply broke down, it resulted from a perceived problem caused سے طرف کی Quincies annihilating Hollow souls completely. Essentially, the Quincies were destroyed in order to hold to a certain balance of souls between Soul Society and the material world.
There seems to be a lot left out of this analysis, but I'll get to that in a bit. What's most important from this explanation is that it's the first time we're told straight up that Soul Society may not be on the side of justice. When Kajoumaru, the man giving the explanation, is asked about which side was just in their actions, he stated that both sides were just. It was an effective way to explain it, and yet ineffective at the same time.
From the beginning of the series, we've been pushed to believe that the Soul Society always does what's best and acts ethically. Suddenly, we're not so sure. Their actions seem motivated سے طرف کی greater causes, to be sure, but theirs is a consequentionalist viewpoint (basically, the ends justify the means). From a deontological standpoint, they're not moral nor just, since they're utilizing other beings lives as a means to an end.
In fact, it seems that they defy deontological ethics throughout the series. Every time they kill an arrancar, they justify it سے طرف کی saying that the arrancar was a potential danger to society, using much the same logic. We're told, for most of the series anyway, not to care about Hollow at all because they're mindless, soulless killing machines. Then we're presented with arrancar, who defy everything we know about Hollow, and yet the moral سوال about killing them only comes from Zommari Reneaux in an impassioned speech:
There seems to be a lot left out of this analysis, but I'll get to that in a bit. What's most important from this explanation is that it's the first time we're told straight up that Soul Society may not be on the side of justice. When Kajoumaru, the man giving the explanation, is asked about which side was just in their actions, he stated that both sides were just. It was an effective way to explain it, and yet ineffective at the same time.
From the beginning of the series, we've been pushed to believe that the Soul Society always does what's best and acts ethically. Suddenly, we're not so sure. Their actions seem motivated سے طرف کی greater causes, to be sure, but theirs is a consequentionalist viewpoint (basically, the ends justify the means). From a deontological standpoint, they're not moral nor just, since they're utilizing other beings lives as a means to an end.
In fact, it seems that they defy deontological ethics throughout the series. Every time they kill an arrancar, they justify it سے طرف کی saying that the arrancar was a potential danger to society, using much the same logic. We're told, for most of the series anyway, not to care about Hollow at all because they're mindless, soulless killing machines. Then we're presented with arrancar, who defy everything we know about Hollow, and yet the moral سوال about killing them only comes from Zommari Reneaux in an impassioned speech:
|
next question » | ||
|