Logical reasons...
why Harry Potter v.s Twilight
*WARNING SPOILERS*
Hi! I'm Cinnominbubble and I have noticed the war between fandoms have been going on for a while with no clear outcome. There is a reason to this-We are stubborn. Twihards want to stick up for Stephanie Meyer, whilst Potterheads want to do the same for J. K. Rowling. But, I have noticed something. Many of our reasonings aren't exactly logical. I mean, not to be offensive, some of our strongest points are downright idiotic!(from both sides) I'd like to come up with some smarter points to help people see our side of the story, whatever that side may be! It would do well to expect مزید of these in the future because of all the idiocy going around.(Again, not to be offensive)
I am a پرستار of Harry Potter but I'd like to acknowledge both sides to the story. People will be yelling at me at the end of this, so in advance, I say sorry for anything offensive.
-First off, I'd just like to say to آپ twihards, Harry Potter came first in 1998, whereas Twilight came out in 2005, I believe. So J.K Rowling did not copy Stephanie Meyer. I am in possession of both these series' and though Jacob and Sirius both have the same last name, and can both transform into dog-like figures, that is where the similarities stop. Sirius Black is a prisoner escaped from the wizard prison, Azkaban, where he was placed under false pretences. He is an old friend of Harry's parents, and is also Harry's godfather. He is only able to become a dog because he is an animagus, a witch یا wizard with the ability to transform into a certain animal at will. He became an Animagus illegally in order to help his friend, Remus Lupin, who was a werewolf, through those bleak nights where there was a full moon. Werewolves only attack humans and so Sirius was only محفوظ while in his dog form. Jacob Black on the other hand, is not a real werewolf. In Breaking Dawn, his species is called Shape-shifters as Aro says himself. He is only a shape-shifter because it runs in his family and... Yah. That subject all cleared up? I hope so.
-I have heard people saying that Twilight is a better love story but there's an easy answer to that... Harry Potter isn't a love story. Sure, if آپ are into that genre, go for Twilight, but is not fair to say that Harry Potter is a bad book just because it's not a romance novel.
-Yah, ok the Harry Potter characters have flaws! Bella and Rosalie seem to be the only ones with flaws in the entire series, Bella's being her disability to understand what goes on around her sometimes, and Rosalie's being over-the-top-jeolosy... Those don't even seem like flaws! Harry's cast on the other hand, has plenty of flaws. Hermione with her buck-teeth and bad posture, Mrs. Weasley with her over-protectiveness et cetera. But as someone in history said, Flaws are what give your character, well, character! There are plenty of people in Harry Potter with less flaws(Cho, Cedric, et al.) but flaws none the less. So again, if آپ prefer کتابیں where آپ characters are close to perfect, be my guest and read Twilight. I personally found the characters مزید relatable,(mainly Hermione) with their flaws and anger management issues.
Now I know I haven't addressed most of the major questions, but I honestly can't remember anymore(it's 10:06 PM, I just came ہوم from piano! Cut me some slack please...wow I whine a lot!) Feel free to give me feedback, سوالات and requests for my اگلے article(this is my first for Logical Reasons) Go ahead, tell me how bad it is, cant get any worse than what I (or Ralph[inside joke]) tell myself:D I will ترمیم to accommodate all new questions, unless I get an overflow of questions. I will create an مضمون for any point, if logical and/or if I understand/know of it. Since this is my first, I don't expect much. Just, if آپ have any negative comments(Twihards, if I wrote something wrong etc.)tell me in non ایوارڈز form(don't be angry)
Yours in demigodishness, and all that. Peace Out!
Cinnominbubble >.<
why Harry Potter v.s Twilight
*WARNING SPOILERS*
Hi! I'm Cinnominbubble and I have noticed the war between fandoms have been going on for a while with no clear outcome. There is a reason to this-We are stubborn. Twihards want to stick up for Stephanie Meyer, whilst Potterheads want to do the same for J. K. Rowling. But, I have noticed something. Many of our reasonings aren't exactly logical. I mean, not to be offensive, some of our strongest points are downright idiotic!(from both sides) I'd like to come up with some smarter points to help people see our side of the story, whatever that side may be! It would do well to expect مزید of these in the future because of all the idiocy going around.(Again, not to be offensive)
I am a پرستار of Harry Potter but I'd like to acknowledge both sides to the story. People will be yelling at me at the end of this, so in advance, I say sorry for anything offensive.
-First off, I'd just like to say to آپ twihards, Harry Potter came first in 1998, whereas Twilight came out in 2005, I believe. So J.K Rowling did not copy Stephanie Meyer. I am in possession of both these series' and though Jacob and Sirius both have the same last name, and can both transform into dog-like figures, that is where the similarities stop. Sirius Black is a prisoner escaped from the wizard prison, Azkaban, where he was placed under false pretences. He is an old friend of Harry's parents, and is also Harry's godfather. He is only able to become a dog because he is an animagus, a witch یا wizard with the ability to transform into a certain animal at will. He became an Animagus illegally in order to help his friend, Remus Lupin, who was a werewolf, through those bleak nights where there was a full moon. Werewolves only attack humans and so Sirius was only محفوظ while in his dog form. Jacob Black on the other hand, is not a real werewolf. In Breaking Dawn, his species is called Shape-shifters as Aro says himself. He is only a shape-shifter because it runs in his family and... Yah. That subject all cleared up? I hope so.
-I have heard people saying that Twilight is a better love story but there's an easy answer to that... Harry Potter isn't a love story. Sure, if آپ are into that genre, go for Twilight, but is not fair to say that Harry Potter is a bad book just because it's not a romance novel.
-Yah, ok the Harry Potter characters have flaws! Bella and Rosalie seem to be the only ones with flaws in the entire series, Bella's being her disability to understand what goes on around her sometimes, and Rosalie's being over-the-top-jeolosy... Those don't even seem like flaws! Harry's cast on the other hand, has plenty of flaws. Hermione with her buck-teeth and bad posture, Mrs. Weasley with her over-protectiveness et cetera. But as someone in history said, Flaws are what give your character, well, character! There are plenty of people in Harry Potter with less flaws(Cho, Cedric, et al.) but flaws none the less. So again, if آپ prefer کتابیں where آپ characters are close to perfect, be my guest and read Twilight. I personally found the characters مزید relatable,(mainly Hermione) with their flaws and anger management issues.
Now I know I haven't addressed most of the major questions, but I honestly can't remember anymore(it's 10:06 PM, I just came ہوم from piano! Cut me some slack please...wow I whine a lot!) Feel free to give me feedback, سوالات and requests for my اگلے article(this is my first for Logical Reasons) Go ahead, tell me how bad it is, cant get any worse than what I (or Ralph[inside joke]) tell myself:D I will ترمیم to accommodate all new questions, unless I get an overflow of questions. I will create an مضمون for any point, if logical and/or if I understand/know of it. Since this is my first, I don't expect much. Just, if آپ have any negative comments(Twihards, if I wrote something wrong etc.)tell me in non ایوارڈز form(don't be angry)
Yours in demigodishness, and all that. Peace Out!
Cinnominbubble >.<
I'm going to start doing مضامین like this because I think it's fun and I just wanna see who thinks one character is better than the other.
Before آپ guys start, let me tell آپ my opinion. I think that Bellatrix is the better villan because she's mean, crazy and cruel but also happens to have good fighting skills, even though I hate her for hurting Hermione. She's also not afraid [potterheads correct me if i'm wrong] to kill others. She pretty much has the ultimate personality and guts that Villaness's have.
Those are my opinions. Now... feel free to add yours!! Enjoy:)
Before آپ guys start, let me tell آپ my opinion. I think that Bellatrix is the better villan because she's mean, crazy and cruel but also happens to have good fighting skills, even though I hate her for hurting Hermione. She's also not afraid [potterheads correct me if i'm wrong] to kill others. She pretty much has the ultimate personality and guts that Villaness's have.
Those are my opinions. Now... feel free to add yours!! Enjoy:)
harry potter is now logged in
harry ;anyone here i bored and can't do Magie
Ginny;y w has now logged in
ginny; yea am here this is why better then are old owl lol
harry; huh? lol wants that tell ron say hi d hi
ron w has lodged in
ron; hi harry was up and ginny get out of this chat room
ginny; u can't make me
harry; ron ginny be nice and can any one till me what lol and waz means
ginny; lol means laughter out loud and wazwantt is up
ron ;lol means laughh out loud and waz want is up
ginny; آپ took the words right out of my mouth
edwardcullen has now logged in
edwardcullen; I WEAR GIRLS CLOTHS AND AM A SPIKING VAMPIRE WHO HAPPENS TO BE IN LOVE WITH A HUMAN GIRL
harry; freak
ron; yea
ginny; get off hear your in the wrong chat room go to the one with the six سال olds
edwardcullen; ok
edwardcullen has logged out
ginny has logge out
harry has logged out
ron has logged out
harry ;anyone here i bored and can't do Magie
Ginny;y w has now logged in
ginny; yea am here this is why better then are old owl lol
harry; huh? lol wants that tell ron say hi d hi
ron w has lodged in
ron; hi harry was up and ginny get out of this chat room
ginny; u can't make me
harry; ron ginny be nice and can any one till me what lol and waz means
ginny; lol means laughter out loud and wazwantt is up
ron ;lol means laughh out loud and waz want is up
ginny; آپ took the words right out of my mouth
edwardcullen has now logged in
edwardcullen; I WEAR GIRLS CLOTHS AND AM A SPIKING VAMPIRE WHO HAPPENS TO BE IN LOVE WITH A HUMAN GIRL
harry; freak
ron; yea
ginny; get off hear your in the wrong chat room go to the one with the six سال olds
edwardcullen; ok
edwardcullen has logged out
ginny has logge out
harry has logged out
ron has logged out
first off i would like to say that i used to like t but everyone ruined it.
hp is so much better because its about friendship and standing up for your self it shows fear and judement and kind and tenderness which in twilight its just about useing people to benifit آپ and doin iti mean in twilight, it takes edward and bella what a week to fall in love it takes ron and herimone over 7 years and harry starts to relize he loves ginny after 5 years! and not to mention hp is fun for everyone some people might be afraid of the fact of a man eating vampire watching them not knowing when there going to attack out of hunger. so when آپ "twilight" شائقین find some real evidence that twilight has any real moral to it let me know cause i really like to know wat آپ think. یا just تبصرہ on this مضمون PEACE, sy-sy
hp is so much better because its about friendship and standing up for your self it shows fear and judement and kind and tenderness which in twilight its just about useing people to benifit آپ and doin iti mean in twilight, it takes edward and bella what a week to fall in love it takes ron and herimone over 7 years and harry starts to relize he loves ginny after 5 years! and not to mention hp is fun for everyone some people might be afraid of the fact of a man eating vampire watching them not knowing when there going to attack out of hunger. so when آپ "twilight" شائقین find some real evidence that twilight has any real moral to it let me know cause i really like to know wat آپ think. یا just تبصرہ on this مضمون PEACE, sy-sy