دیںجواب کا سوال اس

The Critical Analysis of Harry Potter سوال

Can آپ فہرست at least ONE flaw in the Harry Potter books?

Please? I just want to see who is capable.

It has to be from the books, not the فلمیں یا the fandom, یا about people آپ know.
Empty جوابات like "It ended!" یا "It was translated into American English" یا "America changed the عنوان to 'Sorcerer's Stone'" (because that has nothing to do with the story) don't count. It has to be a genuine flaw that has nothing to do with the کتابیں being too amazing, perfect, great, یا awesome.

Fact یا opinion, it doesn't matter.

Thank you.
*
I just realized I came across as condescending. I didn't mean to put "who's capable", I meant "who's willing to". Sorry.
cassie-1-2-3 posted پہلے زیادہ سے سال ایک
 cassie-1-2-3 posted پہلے زیادہ سے سال ایک
next question »

The Critical Analysis of Harry Potter جوابات

VampiresRevenge said:
Both of these I debated with someone in the HP vs Twilight spot, but I'll post them here anyway:

- Harry remembering what happened what he was 1 سال old. I don't care how traumatic the experience was (even though he would have been led to believe that it was a car accident for the rest of his life if Hagrid hadn't told him), no one can remember the exact words and noises from an event when they were 1. He remembered the green light, Lily screaming, and exactly what James said, and I just don't think that's possible.

- Someone, somewhere, would HAVE to have died in the same manner that Harry's parents did. All throughout the book it's presented as Lily's love that protected Harry from being killed سے طرف کی Avada Kedavra. Now, don't آپ think that since wizards have been around for centuries, that at least one مزید person would have jumped in to protect someone from that spell? That they too would protect them with their love? Yet, Harry is the only person to survive the curse. I get that there are مزید details to Harry's case, but they always کہا it boiled down to Lily's love that protected him. یا is Harry just special enough to begin with that only HE is capable of being loved that much?

Maybe these are just my opinions since they could be debated, but I saw them as flaws. Other people may not یا may see something different in them.
select as best answer
posted پہلے زیادہ سے سال ایک 
*
uhm, first of harry remember all those things partially because he is linked to voldy and voldemort clearly remembers the events of that night therefore he is able to remember.... second: harry parents death and the whole event was a different case, if آپ have bother to watch the movie closely آپ would have remember dumbledore saying that voldy knew parts of the prohecy so he wanted to kill harry. he was side tracked that night and he enjoyed taunting people. he tried to "persuade lily" to give up harry and he would spare her but has every intention of killing her. upon seeing the boy, voldy aimed his wand at harry. lily on the ground ( would voldy thought would be too slow to react)did the one thing she could and threw herself in between. thus the entire story.. anyways, the point is JKR was trying to دکھائیں that the lust of evil can consume one. voldy was so eager to kill the so called one that was destined to kill him in the future that some things slipped his mind.
alisonfaith297 posted پہلے زیادہ سے سال ایک
*
ok. this is an extremely late reply and i'm sorry.. havent been on this post for a while.
alisonfaith297 posted پہلے زیادہ سے سال ایک
*
i recognise your use of psychology, before i اقدام on i wanna just state the only thing that harry remember is the green light the scream was trigger from hadgrid. looking in to the multi-store model سے طرف کی atkinson and shiffrin(1968) sensory memory does decay easily but one can focus attention on to it and thus is remember. yes there is a lack of neural connections however there ARE neural connections. it is still possible to form such memories. they are there.
alisonfaith297 posted پہلے زیادہ سے سال ایک
NightFrog said:
Ginny and Harry's relationship. I hated how rushed it was. Ginny went from a rather timid side character into a popular, talented, gorgious love interest. Harry showed no romantic interest in her before, not in the slightest, and suddenly in Half-Blood Prince he was crazy about her.

That's a major thing that bothered me, anyway.

EDIT: I also didn't like how the Slytherins were mostly all considered bad (with a few acceptions like Regulus, Severus, and Slughorn.) In the final battle when they were told to leave, I wished a few would have stayed. Through most of the series, the Slytherins were the "jeering kids in green" booing the Gryffindors and almost everyone else for that matter. I wish we had مزید insight on them other than sneaky bullies.
select as best answer
posted پہلے زیادہ سے سال ایک 
*
i kinda agreed about the movies.. but the thing is if آپ read te books.. there is way مزید too it. so on that part i blame the producers but then again.. i dont cae much for the romance in HP
alisonfaith297 posted پہلے زیادہ سے سال ایک
*
again.. thats mainly a reference to the movie only..
alisonfaith297 posted پہلے زیادہ سے سال ایک
*
I completely agree about everything!
thisthat12 posted پہلے زیادہ سے سال ایک
ClaireVoyant said:
The amount of student in hogwarts.
Favoritism toward gryffindor.
But thatls just me

select as best answer
posted پہلے زیادہ سے سال ایک 
*
I agree- especially about the favoritism towards Gryffindor.
NightFrog posted پہلے زیادہ سے سال ایک
*
i dont understand about amount of students in hogwarts..what does that mean.. though the point of gryffindor, i get where آپ are coming, but the thing is the main storyline was always in harry, ron and hermione. of course other things happen but if JKR were to write about all houses and everyone in the house the کتابیں would be 5 times as long and the فلمیں even longer... so she put a stand on each.. gryffindor is good and slytherin evil... therefor again the theme.. good vs evil and good always wins..
alisonfaith297 posted پہلے زیادہ سے سال ایک
*
I think the point about the number of student is that there are nt enought of them. In my high school, there were almost three hundered studests in my year, and 1600 in the whole school and there are only about fourty students in Harry's سال and no مزید than 300 in the whole school. I think I can explain this though. First of all, Harry's generation had been born in the middle of the first wizarding war. Not many parents would want to have children around this time because of the threat of death eaters. Also, so many people were killed in the war (which lasted 11 years) that there weren't as many magical parents to pass on the magical genes to the اگلے generation. Thirdly, the families in the books, excluding the Weasleys, are never mentioned to have lots of children. Most of the characters are never shown to have siblings (like Hannh Abbott and Ernie Macmillan) and people like Drace Malfoy and Neville Longbottom are only childs. Also, there can't be that many muggle borns in the worl
Book-Freak posted پہلے زیادہ سے سال ایک
simpleplan said:
There are not that many kids at Hogwarts.

Harry remebering things from when he was one.

Voldemort always attacks Harry یا the school at the end of the year. I guess Voldy did not want to mess with anyones studys.

Ron should know much about magic.

They let Lockheart teach the students when he did not know what he was doing.
select as best answer
posted پہلے زیادہ سے سال ایک 
*
what does the amount of kids have to do with a flaw?? i still ڈن, اڑانا understand. @ clairvoyant talked about the number of students, i ڈن, اڑانا get why that would be a flaw??
alisonfaith297 posted پہلے زیادہ سے سال ایک
zanhar1 said:
Bellatrix died!
Gryffindors is favored.
Ginny is a Mary-Sue
select as best answer
posted پہلے زیادہ سے سال ایک 
cunha27 said:
I gave this answer to a similar سوال in the Harry Potter spot:

Why wasn't the Fidelius charm used مزید often? Eg:

1)Why didn't Voldemort use the Fidelius Charm to hide at least some of his Horcruxes? Even if he was unable to cast the charm (possibly because he didn't have a complete soul,) he could have gotten someone else to cast it and then have them reveal the location to him.

2) The same goes for Dumbledore while attempting to hide the philosopher's stone.

3) Instead of growing such a dangerous Willow, why not just take young Remus to a secret kept location. No risk of students being attacked سے طرف کی the درخت یا accidentally entering یا being lured into the shack.
select as best answer
posted پہلے زیادہ سے سال ایک 
*
 Also the Felix Felicis potion. Why didn't anyone brew it, take it and then set off to vanquish the dark lord, it supposedly makes the drinker successful at anything he/she undertakes. Why didn't they use the time turner مزید often. Eg to go back in time to see who released the troll, to follow Ginny یا whoever took Ginny into th chamber of secrets,  etc. Surely iDumbledore could have procured his own time turner and used it to fight against Voldemort.  The whole تلاش for the Horcruxes would have been completed much sooner. 
cunha27 posted پہلے زیادہ سے سال ایک
-Harmony- said:
Harry didn't marry Hermione.
select as best answer
posted پہلے زیادہ سے سال ایک 
TriaRose said:
This is a site with some errors like "Harry heard the door shut" and a few sentences later "Harry went over and shut the door. link
There are also others, such as how Voldemort got his wand from Godric's Hallow, how the Weasley twins never noticed Pettigrew on the Maurader's Map, and others listed above as well.
select as best answer
posted پہلے زیادہ سے سال ایک 
next question »